Overlooked role of company-specific disclosures in ESRS

05 Jun 2023
Piotr Biernacki
Sustainability Managing Partner
It is likely that in just a few dozen hours we will know the content of the ESRS standards in the form of draft delegated acts that the European Commission will submit for public consultation. Most of their content will not change with respect to the drafts submitted in November 2022 by EFRAG, but there will probably be a few changed mechanisms for applying the standards. The role of materiality testing will increase. So it is worth recalling company-specific disclosures, as they are based on the results of this study.

The ESRS system of standards has three layers. The first is universal standards, used by all companies. The Commission will issue them in the form of delegated acts in the coming weeks. The second layer will be sector-specific standards, which are likely to start applying on January 1, 2026, and we will learn their content gradually over the coming years. The third layer will be company-specific disclosures.

Each reporting company, after conducting a materiality study, must apply the relevant disclosures from the common and sector standards appropriate to its industry. If, after applying all of these sectors, it were to turn out that there were any remaining impacts, risks or opportunities not included in the report, then the company must prepare industry-specific disclosures about them. These are not designed into the standards, but ESRS 1 provides instructions to consider when creating such disclosures.

The lack of sector standards and the delay in their implementation will therefore create a rather uncomfortable situation for companies. If we already had sector standards, then all or almost all impacts, risks and opportunities deemed material in any company would be included in them, and the use of company-specific disclosures would be sporadic. In the early years of the CSRD, however, it may be that reports consist largely of company-specific disclosures.

Applying company-specific disclosures is more labor-intensive. After all, you have to spend time not only gathering data and information to complete a particular disclosure, but you also have to design that disclosure beforehand. Auditors will scrutinize such disclosures extremely closely; after all, they do not have a template presented in the standards against which they can examine their content completed by the company.

In addition to being labor-intensive, each non-standardized reporting element also raises risks related to legal uncertainty. Reducing the number of disclosure requirements and delaying the application of sector standards may therefore not bring companies reporting ease at all, but more work, costs and stress. I hope, however, that these are temporary problems that will fade on their own when the entire ESRS system stabilizes in the second half of the decade.

Share

Let's stay in touch

These articles you may be interested in

The website of the Ministry of Development and Technology has published a „Guide to Conducting Climate-Related Physical Risk Analysis for Climate-Related Activities".
Justyna Biernacka
10 Mar 2026
Gender equality has become an element in companies' ESG reporting and global sustainability strategy. Understanding the role of women requires a view that goes beyond
08 Mar 2026
You are invited to participate in a webinar on current sustainability and ESG regulations organized by the Sustainability Working Group.
03 Mar 2026