Sources of information in the significance study

October 14, 2024
Piotr Biernacki
Sustainability Managing Partner
The materiality assessment is based on various sources of information. Together, they should provide us with a basis for determining which sustainability issues are associated with significant impacts and which, in turn, are associated with opportunities and risks for the company. Some methods of obtaining information are quite obvious, including interviews with key stakeholders or questionnaires among senior management. However, sometimes it is possible to use sources of information that are not universal and only relate to specific issues. How can they be used?

One of the most important greenhouse gases (because it has the strongest impact on the climate) is methane. It is quite obvious that if methane leaks occur in our company's operations, climate change issues will be relevant to us. The same may be true if we are associated with methane leaks through business relationships in our value chain.

We can support each other in analyzing this issue using data obtained from the initiative. Carbon Mapper. For several years, this initiative has been collecting and publishing data on methane leaks recorded in various ways. Since last week, one of the sources of data has been observations made by a satellite specially designed for this purpose. The data can be viewed free of charge at this website.

Is Carbon Mapper a complete source of information on methane emissions? No. Do we have to use it because standards require it? No. So why should we bother with it? Because it is one of many sources of information that we can use in our materiality assessment. If we operate in an industry where methane leaks occur, or if such industries include companies with which we have business relationships within the value chain, then we can use Carbon Mapper. Perhaps we will obtain information from it that will confirm our belief that climate change is an important issue for us.

When conducting materiality testing, there are usually many dilemmas of this type: which sources to use, which reports to refer to. And that's a good thing! Materiality testing is all about searching for information that will allow us to determine what is material. There are as many paths leading to this determination as there are companies for which materiality studies are conducted. Therefore, the ESRS standards do not impose a single correct research methodology or provide a closed list of information sources. Instead, we must always exercise due diligence when conducting research.

Due diligence is dynamic in nature. There is no predefined detailed list of activities that must be performed in order for it to be fulfilled. It always depends on the specific circumstances: the company for which the audit is being conducted, its key stakeholders, but also the social and economic circumstances in which the audit is being conducted.

Share

Let's stay in touch

These articles you may be interested in

The European Commission is gathering feedback on what due diligence should look like in practice. It is seeking examples, tools, and real-world experiences from companies. [...]
July 13, 2026
The terms LCA, EPD, and product carbon footprint are increasingly coming up in discussions within R&D departments, among procurement teams, and during [...]
Marta Kęsik
July 9, 2026
A report by Magdalena Błachowiak, Sustainability Specialist at MATERIALITY, on the ESG Ideas Fair organized by FOB, during which experts [...]
June 30, 2026